It's Election Day, and you know what that means...
...another long political post from Keryn that you can ignore. Yay!
So...the Senate races are some of the biggest to watch. In particular, I'll be looking at:
- Nevada (duh): Angle (R) vs Reid (D). This one is going to be a squeaker. I'd like to think Angle wins, but I don't know. We'll just have to see. (Reid wins. Bummer.)
- California: Fiorina (R) vs Boxer (D). I think this one stays with Boxer, although I'll be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't. Boxer comes across as a somewhat obnoxious, and occasionally entitled incumbent; it would be a pleasure if she didn't get sent back to Washington. (Boxer wins.)
- Colorado: Buck (R) vs Bennet (D). I don't know too much about this one, but it is a toss-up, apparently.
- Alaska: Miller (R) vs McAdams (D) vs Murkowski (Entitled). This one is interesting. Murkowski is the incumbent, but she lost the primary nomination to Miller. She then decided to run a write-in campaign, essentially becoming a pretty sore loser about the primary. (I have Opinions about this.) The Alaska Board of Elections, on Thursday, decided to change its rules to allow lists of write-in candidates' names in the polling places, giving Murkowski a distinct advantage. There have been some very sleazy events surrounding this election. However, polling looks good, and it's hopeful that Miller will win. We'll see!
- Washington, Pennsylvania (goes to Republican, thankyouverymuch Arlen Specter R-2, D-2), West Virginia (stays Democratic), and Illinois (President Obama's old seat has gone Republican!) are good ones to watch, as well.
Also, keep an eye on Massachusetts' Barney Frank, who might not win reelection. Heh heh. (Bummer. He wins.)
Also, there are some governor's races to watch.
- Colorado: Hickenlooper (D) vs Tancredo (Annoying) vs Maes (R). I have Opinions about this race as well. Specifically, I think that if the primary voters choose a particular nominee (Maes), then the state GOP should darn well better get behind him and support him. If they can't support the people's choice for nominee, then they should RESIGN their positions in the state party. In this case, that didn't happen. And now Maes has single digit support, and the race is between Hickenlooper and Tancredo. Basically, I'm hoping for Hickenlooper, but since I don't live there, I don't know what that would mean for day-to-day stuff. Still, I'm highly annoyed at Tancredo and the CO state GOP. (Hickenlooper wins.)
- California: Whitman (R) vs Brown (D). Brown was governor of California from 1975 to 1983, so he knows what's what. Whitman is a multi-killjionaire CEO. This will be interesting. I don't know why anyone would want to be in charge of the mess that is California right now, but different people have different tastes. (Brown wins the...honor?)
What do you all think?
I found your political blava interesting! :) I too was watching the Buck/Bennet race as they are the Senators from our district. Too bad Buck lost. I met him a few times and found him to be sincere and quite smart. I SOOOO agree with you on the Colorado Gov. race--what a joke!! The GOP blew that whole thing BIG time. I know a lot of folks that traveled as delegates to Denver to cast their vote for Maes. He won the Primary fair and square. Tancredo is seriously mental. Bug! Oh well. Hickenlooper will hopefully govern from the center. Too bad it is a year for redistricting though. Colorado gets bluer each year!!! There's my 2 bits.
The reason I know so much about the governor's race is because of you! On the drive back home from your house, Bradley told me all about your discussion about it. Annoying situation!
Thanks for your take! I love to know about other states (especially more exciting ones than Utah!).
Post a Comment